lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171222084628.284174322@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:46:09 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, aliguori@...zon.com,
        daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at, hughd@...gle.com, keescook@...gle.com,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 084/159] x86/entry: Fix assumptions that the HW TSS is at the beginning of cpu_tss

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>

commit 7fb983b4dd569e08564134a850dfd4eb1c63d9b8 upstream.

A future patch will move SYSENTER_stack to the beginning of cpu_tss
to help detect overflow.  Before this can happen, fix several code
paths that hardcode assumptions about the old layout.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: aliguori@...zon.com
Cc: daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at
Cc: hughd@...gle.com
Cc: keescook@...gle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171204150605.722425540@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h      |    2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h |    9 +++++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c     |    8 ++++----
 arch/x86/kernel/doublefault.c    |   32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c               |    2 +-
 arch/x86/power/cpu.c             |   13 +++++++------
 6 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static inline void set_tssldt_descriptor
 #endif
 }
 
-static inline void __set_tss_desc(unsigned cpu, unsigned int entry, void *addr)
+static inline void __set_tss_desc(unsigned cpu, unsigned int entry, struct x86_hw_tss *addr)
 {
 	struct desc_struct *d = get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu);
 	tss_desc tss;
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ enum cpuid_regs_idx {
 extern struct cpuinfo_x86	boot_cpu_data;
 extern struct cpuinfo_x86	new_cpu_data;
 
-extern struct tss_struct	doublefault_tss;
+extern struct x86_hw_tss	doublefault_tss;
 extern __u32			cpu_caps_cleared[NCAPINTS];
 extern __u32			cpu_caps_set[NCAPINTS];
 
@@ -252,6 +252,11 @@ static inline void load_cr3(pgd_t *pgdir
 	write_cr3(__sme_pa(pgdir));
 }
 
+/*
+ * Note that while the legacy 'TSS' name comes from 'Task State Segment',
+ * on modern x86 CPUs the TSS also holds information important to 64-bit mode,
+ * unrelated to the task-switch mechanism:
+ */
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 /* This is the TSS defined by the hardware. */
 struct x86_hw_tss {
@@ -322,7 +327,7 @@ struct x86_hw_tss {
 #define IO_BITMAP_BITS			65536
 #define IO_BITMAP_BYTES			(IO_BITMAP_BITS/8)
 #define IO_BITMAP_LONGS			(IO_BITMAP_BYTES/sizeof(long))
-#define IO_BITMAP_OFFSET		offsetof(struct tss_struct, io_bitmap)
+#define IO_BITMAP_OFFSET		(offsetof(struct tss_struct, io_bitmap) - offsetof(struct tss_struct, x86_tss))
 #define INVALID_IO_BITMAP_OFFSET	0x8000
 
 struct tss_struct {
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ void cpu_init(void)
 		}
 	}
 
-	t->x86_tss.io_bitmap_base = offsetof(struct tss_struct, io_bitmap);
+	t->x86_tss.io_bitmap_base = IO_BITMAP_OFFSET;
 
 	/*
 	 * <= is required because the CPU will access up to
@@ -1576,7 +1576,7 @@ void cpu_init(void)
 	 * Initialize the TSS.  Don't bother initializing sp0, as the initial
 	 * task never enters user mode.
 	 */
-	set_tss_desc(cpu, t);
+	set_tss_desc(cpu, &t->x86_tss);
 	load_TR_desc();
 
 	load_mm_ldt(&init_mm);
@@ -1634,12 +1634,12 @@ void cpu_init(void)
 	 * Initialize the TSS.  Don't bother initializing sp0, as the initial
 	 * task never enters user mode.
 	 */
-	set_tss_desc(cpu, t);
+	set_tss_desc(cpu, &t->x86_tss);
 	load_TR_desc();
 
 	load_mm_ldt(&init_mm);
 
-	t->x86_tss.io_bitmap_base = offsetof(struct tss_struct, io_bitmap);
+	t->x86_tss.io_bitmap_base = IO_BITMAP_OFFSET;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DOUBLEFAULT
 	/* Set up doublefault TSS pointer in the GDT */
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/doublefault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/doublefault.c
@@ -50,25 +50,23 @@ static void doublefault_fn(void)
 		cpu_relax();
 }
 
-struct tss_struct doublefault_tss __cacheline_aligned = {
-	.x86_tss = {
-		.sp0		= STACK_START,
-		.ss0		= __KERNEL_DS,
-		.ldt		= 0,
-		.io_bitmap_base	= INVALID_IO_BITMAP_OFFSET,
+struct x86_hw_tss doublefault_tss __cacheline_aligned = {
+	.sp0		= STACK_START,
+	.ss0		= __KERNEL_DS,
+	.ldt		= 0,
+	.io_bitmap_base	= INVALID_IO_BITMAP_OFFSET,
 
-		.ip		= (unsigned long) doublefault_fn,
-		/* 0x2 bit is always set */
-		.flags		= X86_EFLAGS_SF | 0x2,
-		.sp		= STACK_START,
-		.es		= __USER_DS,
-		.cs		= __KERNEL_CS,
-		.ss		= __KERNEL_DS,
-		.ds		= __USER_DS,
-		.fs		= __KERNEL_PERCPU,
+	.ip		= (unsigned long) doublefault_fn,
+	/* 0x2 bit is always set */
+	.flags		= X86_EFLAGS_SF | 0x2,
+	.sp		= STACK_START,
+	.es		= __USER_DS,
+	.cs		= __KERNEL_CS,
+	.ss		= __KERNEL_DS,
+	.ds		= __USER_DS,
+	.fs		= __KERNEL_PERCPU,
 
-		.__cr3		= __pa_nodebug(swapper_pg_dir),
-	}
+	.__cr3		= __pa_nodebug(swapper_pg_dir),
 };
 
 /* dummy for do_double_fault() call */
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2295,7 +2295,7 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcp
 		 * processors.  See 22.2.4.
 		 */
 		vmcs_writel(HOST_TR_BASE,
-			    (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_tss));
+			    (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_tss.x86_tss));
 		vmcs_writel(HOST_GDTR_BASE, (unsigned long)gdt);   /* 22.2.4 */
 
 		/*
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
@@ -165,12 +165,13 @@ static void fix_processor_context(void)
 	struct desc_struct *desc = get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu);
 	tss_desc tss;
 #endif
-	set_tss_desc(cpu, t);	/*
-				 * This just modifies memory; should not be
-				 * necessary. But... This is necessary, because
-				 * 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some
-				 * similar stupidity.
-				 */
+
+	/*
+	 * This just modifies memory; should not be necessary. But... This is
+	 * necessary, because 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some
+	 * similar stupidity.
+	 */
+	set_tss_desc(cpu, &t->x86_tss);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	memcpy(&tss, &desc[GDT_ENTRY_TSS], sizeof(tss_desc));


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ