linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 016/104] vsock: cancel packets when failing to connect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171222084610.651083229@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:45:42 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
        Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 016/104] vsock: cancel packets when failing to connect

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>


[ Upstream commit 380feae0def7e6a115124a3219c3ec9b654dca32 ]

Otherwise we'll leave the packets queued until releasing vsock device.
E.g., if guest is slow to start up, resulting ETIMEDOUT on connect, guest
will get the connect requests from failed host sockets.

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1101,10 +1101,19 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgra
 	.sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
 };
 
+static int vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
+{
+	if (!transport->cancel_pkt)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	return transport->cancel_pkt(vsk);
+}
+
 static void vsock_connect_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct sock *sk;
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	int cancel = 0;
 
 	vsk = container_of(work, struct vsock_sock, dwork.work);
 	sk = sk_vsock(vsk);
@@ -1115,8 +1124,11 @@ static void vsock_connect_timeout(struct
 		sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
 		sk->sk_err = ETIMEDOUT;
 		sk->sk_error_report(sk);
+		cancel = 1;
 	}
 	release_sock(sk);
+	if (cancel)
+		vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
 
 	sock_put(sk);
 }
@@ -1223,11 +1235,13 @@ static int vsock_stream_connect(struct s
 			err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
 			sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
 			sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
+			vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
 			goto out_wait;
 		} else if (timeout == 0) {
 			err = -ETIMEDOUT;
 			sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
 			sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
+			vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
 			goto out_wait;
 		}