linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 037/104] i2c: mux: pca954x: Add missing pca9546 definition to chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171222150521.GD28720@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:05:21 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 037/104] i2c: mux: pca954x: Add missing pca9546
 definition to chip_desc

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-12-22 09:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> I don't think this is relevant since the interrupt support code was
> added in 4.11 or something like that with
> f2114795f721 ("i2c: mux: pca954x: Add interrupt controller support")
> 
> Before that pca9545 and pca9546 was handled the same so this patch
> changes nothing. No harm though, so do whatever is simpler.
> 
> Naturally, the same applies for all older stable tree as well...

Now dropped from 3.18, 4.4, and 4.9 stable queues, thanks for letting me
know.

greg k-h