lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Dec 2017 17:29:40 +0100
From:   Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To:     Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] input: touchscreen: sama5d2_rts: SAMA5D2 Resistive
 touchscreen driver

Eugen,

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Eugen Hristev
<eugen.hristev@...rochip.com> wrote:
> This is the implementation of the Microchip SAMA5D2 SOC resistive
> touchscreen driver.

<snip>

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sama5d2_rts.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,287 @@
> +/*
> + * Microchip resistive touchscreen (RTS) driver for SAMA5D2.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Microchip Technology,
> + * Author: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + */


IMHO this should be this as a the first line instead as documented in
Thomas patch set [0] :

> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

I am just a lowly messenger and my weightless voice is as light as the
down feather of a new born goose. But if you have concerns with using
C++ comment styles as you should, please read Linus [1][2][3],
Thomas[4] and Greg[5] comments on the topic.


[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/4/934
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/2/715
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/25/125
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/25/133
[4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/2/805
[5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/19/165

-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne, a kernel licensing scruffy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ