linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the keystone tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:41:45 -0800
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the keystone tree

* Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com> [171222 02:01]:
> On 12/21/2017 3:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> [171221 21:48]:
> > > Hi Tony,
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the omap tree got a conflict in:
> > > 
> > >    arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> > > 
> > > between commit:
> > > 
> > >    d3b15c54ed7e ("ARM: config: sync multi-v7 config with keystone peripherals")
> > > 
> > > from the keystone tree and commit:
> > > 
> > >    d03366dcbffc ("ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable CONFIG_PCI_DRA7XX (Host & Device modes)")
> > > 
> > > from the omap tree.
> > > 
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > > complex conflicts.
> > 
> > Thanks I'll wait on this one so Kishon can check the resulting next.
> > 
> > Santosh, the removal of CONFIG_PCI in multi_v7_defconfig looks a bit
> > suspcicious to me, care to check if commit d3b15c54ed7e is correct?
> > 
> I just used savedefconfig so not sure why some of those needed ones
> got knocked off. For now, I will drop the v7_defconfig patch and
> post it separately later post merge window.

OK thanks for checking. In that case I'll go ahead with Kishon's
changes.

Regards,

Tony