lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 19:30:08 +0100 From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@...il.com> To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, nyc@...omorphy.com, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] memfd: add sealing to hugetlb-backed memory Hi Mike On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote: > On 12/20/2017 04:26 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:10:51 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote: >> >>> On Wed 20-12-17 15:15:50, Marc-André Lureau wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote: >>>>> +Cc: Andrew, Michal, David >>>>> >>>>> Are there any other comments on this patch series from Marc-André? Is anything >>>>> else needed to move forward? >>>>> >>>>> I have reviewed the patches in the series. David Herrmann (the original >>>>> memfd_create/file sealing author) has also taken a look at the patches. >>>>> >>>>> One outstanding issue is sorting out the config option dependencies. Although, >>>>> IMO this is not a strict requirement for this series. I have addressed this >>>>> issue in a follow on series: >>>>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109014109.21077-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com >>>> >>>> Are we good for the next merge window? Is Hugh Dickins the maintainer >>>> with the final word, and doing the pull request? (sorry, I am not very >>>> familiar with kernel development) >>> >>> Andrew will pick it up, I assume. I will try to get and review this but >>> there is way too much going on before holiday. >> >> Yup, things are quiet at present. >> >> I'll suck these up for a bit of testing - please let me know if you'd >> prefer them to be held back for a cycle (ie: for 4.17-rc1) > > Thanks Andrew, > > As mentioned above there is one issue related to this series that we may > want to address. It is described in the series at: > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109014109.21077-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com > > I did not get many comments on this series/issue. If we want to do > something like this, now might be a good time. I am not the best person to say, but I think that series makes a lot of sense (and looks good to me). However, I don't think we need to wait for it to get the sealing support added (furthermore, your rfc series is on top). Thanks! -- Marc-André Lureau
Powered by blists - more mailing lists