linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] hwrng: exynos - add Samsung Exynos True RNG driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOFm3uEj7MDa_7OtigHcUPwvxkR+8cRS=UQq3x_y9k+ypcJPrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Dec 2017 19:30:38 +0100
From:   Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To:     Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com>
Cc:     "Andrew F . Davis" <afd@...com>,
        PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hwrng: exynos - add Samsung Exynos True RNG driver

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com> wrote:
> It was <2017-12-22 pią 14:34>, when Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
>> Łukasz,
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com> wrote:
>>> Add support for True Random Number Generator found in Samsung Exynos
>>> 5250+ SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/exynos-trng.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * RNG driver for Exynos TRNGs
>>> + *
>>> + * Author: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com>
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright 2017 (c) Samsung Electronics Software, Inc.
>>> + *
>>> + * Based on the Exynos PRNG driver drivers/crypto/exynos-rng by
>>> + * Krzysztof Kozłowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>>> + * the Free Software Foundation;
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>> + */
>>
>>
>> Would you mind using the new SPDX tags documented in Thomas patch set
>> [1] rather than this fine but longer legalese?
>>
>> And if you could spread the word to others in your team this would be very nice.
>> See also this fine article posted by Mauro on the Samsung Open Source
>> Group Blog [2]
>> Thank you!
>
> Cool! We've been using SPDX to tag RPM packages in Tizen for three years or
> more. ;-)

Very nice! any pubic pointers?


>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>>
>> Per module.h this means GPL2 or later. This is not matching your
>> license above which does not state any version and therefore would
>> mean GPL1 or later,
>
> Thanks for spotting. My intention is GPL-2.0.
>
>> Please make sure you use something and common rather than this and
>> make sure your MODULE_LICENSE is consistent with the top level
>> license.
>>
>> Was it this way in the code from Krzysztof?
>
> Yes. And omap-rng, the second of my sources of reference, too. Actually,
> the majority of modules still specify "GPL".
>
>  281 | "Dual */*"
> 2082 | "GPL v2"
> 6359 | "GPL"
> ---- +---------
> 8784 | Total
>
> Fixing.


Sigh. That's a lot! Now I have the tool to spot all these differences.
I need to run this and review.
As a first pass aligning the MODULE_LICENSE with the top level would
be something that requires minimal discussion I guess.

>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/4/934
>> [2] https://blogs.s-osg.org/linux-kernel-license-practices-revisited-spdx/
>
> --
> Łukasz Stelmach
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics

-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne