linux-kernel - Re: INFO: task hung in bpf_exit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171222190437.GC6123@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 22 Dec 2017 17:04:37 -0200
From:   Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        syzbot 
        <bot+21b498fc12cf2041655f8e1eeae0733807d794b3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        mschiffer@...verse-factory.net,
        Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
        Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in bpf_exit_net

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 04:28:07PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 11:58:08AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> ...
> > > Same with this one, perhaps related to / fixed by:
> > >     http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/850957/
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Looking at the log, this one seems to be an infinite loop in SCTP code
> > with console output in it. Kernel is busy printing gazilion of:
> > 
> > [  176.491099] sctp: sctp_transport_update_pmtu: Reported pmtu 508 too
> > low, using default minimum of 512
> > ** 110 printk messages dropped **
> > [  176.503409] sctp: sctp_transport_update_pmtu: Reported pmtu 508 too
> > low, using default minimum of 512
> > ** 103 printk messages dropped **
> > ...
> > [  246.742374] sctp: sctp_transport_update_pmtu: Reported pmtu 508 too
> > low, using default minimum of 512
> > [  246.742484] sctp: sctp_transport_update_pmtu: Reported pmtu 508 too
> > low, using default minimum of 512
> > [  246.742590] sctp: sctp_transport_update_pmtu: Reported pmtu 508 too
> > low, using default minimum of 512
> > 
> > Looks like a different issue.
> > 
> 
> Oh. I guess this is caused by the interface having a MTU smaller than
> SCTP_DEFAULT_MINSEGMENT (512), as the icmp frag needed handler
> (sctp_icmp_frag_needed) will trigger an instant retransmission.
> But as the MTU is smaller, SCTP won't update it, but will issue the
> retransmission anyway.
> 
> I will test this soon. Should be fairly easy to trigger it.

Reproduced it.

netns A veth0(1500) - veth1(1500) B veth2(508) - veth3(508) C

When A sends a sctp packet bigger than 508, it triggers the issue as B
will reply a icmp frag needed with a size that sctp won't accept but
will retransmit anyway.

  Marcelo