linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi: Adjustments for four function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171223012917.vbe6mvz4yltiyws3@khazad-dum.debian.net>
Date:   Fri, 22 Dec 2017 23:29:17 -0200
From:   Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <ibm-acpi@....eng.br>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi: Adjustments for four
 function implementations

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26 PM, SF Markus Elfring
> <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:23:45 +0100
> >
> > Two update suggestions were taken into account
> > from static source code analysis.
> >
> > Markus Elfring (2):
> >   Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions
> 
> This one is questionable since it prints error messages at ->init() stage.
> I would rather not touch this.
> 
> >   Improve a size determination in tpacpi_new_rfkill()
> 
> Doesn't make any sense right now. One style over the other.
> Nothing gets better or worth at this point.
> 
> Sorry, but NAK for both.

Agreed.  NAK from me as well.

-- 
  Henrique Holschuh