[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171223144635.GA14599@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 15:46:35 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/78] 4.4.108-stable review
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 10:19:32AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:18:31AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:41AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.108 release.
> > > There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 24 08:45:30 UTC 2017.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> >
> > I lost track with versions. This is with v4.4.107-79-g0989207.
> >
> > Build results:
> > total: 145 pass: 144 fail: 1
> > Failed builds:
> > alpha:allmodconfig
> > Qemu test results:
> > total: 118 pass: 118 fail: 0
> >
> > alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'ev5_switch_mm':
> > arch/alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h:158:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'task_thread_info'
> > arch/alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h:158:24: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
> > alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'init_new_context':
> > arch/alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h:236:24: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
> > arch/alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'enter_lazy_tlb':
> > arch/alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h:250:23: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
> >
> > Didn't I already report this ?
>
> I thought that was a 4.9 issue. Let me look into this later today,
> thanks for the report...
Hm, yeah, looks to be the same issue that 4.9 had. I resolve that by
ripping out the whole series, which I don't want to do here. Let me see
if I can resolve it simpler...
Does anyone even still have alpha machines anymore? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists