lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <397155882.297531.1514045090990@email.1und1.de>
Date:   Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:04:50 +0100 (CET)
From:   Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To:     kishore.p@...hveda.org, eric@...olt.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@...hveda.org>, karthik@...hveda.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        shrikant.maurya@...hveda.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: Prefer BUG_ON instead of if
 condition followed by BUG.

Hi Kishore,

> kishore.p@...hveda.org hat am 23. Dezember 2017 um 16:06 geschrieben:
> 
> 
> From: Kishore KP <kishore.p@...hveda.org>
> 
> Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
> Pointed out by Coccinelle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kishore KP <kishore.p@...hveda.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@...hveda.org>
> ---
> Note:
> - Patch was compile tested and built(ARCH=arm) on linux-next
>   (latest).
> - No build issues reported.
> ---
>  drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c
> index 315b49c..7116f61 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c
> @@ -224,8 +224,7 @@ int vchiq_platform_init(struct platform_device *pdev, VCHIQ_STATE_T *state)
>  
>  	platform_state   = (struct vchiq_2835_state *)state->platform_state;
>  
> -	if (!platform_state->inited)
> -		BUG();
> +	BUG_ON(!platform_state->inited);
>  

vchiq isn't critical so i prefer WARN_ON_ONCE() here.

Thanks
Stefan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ