[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bdafcde7-a7f5-d7d3-9f24-de0eaae013d9@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 09:09:19 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/159] 4.14.9-stable review
On 12/23/2017 06:21 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:15:50AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 04:54:41PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 04:08:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:44:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.9 release.
>>>>> There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Responses should be made by Sun Dec 24 08:45:36 UTC 2017.
>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.9-rc1.gz
>>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y
>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, that blew up hard on arm64, there's now a -rc2 out with a fix for
>>>> that. Hopefully :)
>>>>
>>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.9-rc2.gz
>>>
>>> And because it's just been one of those weeks, there's now a -rc3 out
>>> due to a bunch of important BPF patches.
>>>
>>
>>> I'll stop now to give you all a chance to test...
>>>
>>
>> I can't keep up with this. I'll let my builders try again tonight
>> and report tomorrow.
>>
>> This is what I have so far.
>>
>> h8300 builds are broken.
>>
>> include/linux/compiler.h:344:2: error:
>> implicit declaration of function ‘smp_read_barrier_depends’
>>
>> Seen when building arch/h8300/kernel/asm-offsets.c.
>>
>> sparc32 builds are broken with the same error, in this case when building
>> init/do_mounts_initrd.c.
>
> Ok, I think I found the problem for this, and have added a fix to the
> tree. It builds here for x86 for me, I'll watch your builders and see
> how it goes...
>
This is now fixed. I'll send a complete build report after all builds are
complete.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists