linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 2/6] mailbox: qcom: Create APCS child device for clock controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:27:28 +0530
From:   Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To:     Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/6] mailbox: qcom: Create APCS child device for clock controller

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org> wrote:
> There is a clock controller functionality provided by the APCS hardware
> block of msm8916 devices. The device-tree would represent an APCS node
> with both mailbox and clock provider properties.
>
The spec might depict a 'clock' box and 'mailbox' box inside the
bigger APCS box. However, from the code I see in this patchset, they
are orthogonal and can & should be represented as independent DT
nodes.
Patch-1 is ok, though.

Thanks