lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171225133440.i2v2t25n4bw6ojia@pd.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 25 Dec 2017 14:34:40 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jia Zhang <qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode/intel: Blacklist the specific BDW-EP
 for late loading

+ Tony.

On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 03:49:29PM +0800, Jia Zhang wrote:
> Instead of blacklisting all Broadwell processorsi for running a late
> loading, only BDW-EP (signature 406f1) with the microcode version
> less than 0x0b000021 needs to be blacklisted.
> 
> This is documented in the the public documentation #334165 (See the
> item BDF90 for details).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> index 8ccdca6..f80b2dd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> @@ -910,8 +910,15 @@ static bool is_blacklisted(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
>  
> -	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_X) {
> -		pr_err_once("late loading on model 79 is disabled.\n");
> +	/*
> +	 * The Broadwell-EP processor with the microcode version less
> +	 * then 0x0b000021 may reault in system hang when running a late
> +	 * loading. This behavior is documented in item BDF90, #334165
> +	 * (Intel Xeon Processor E7-8800/4800 v4 Product Family).
> +	 */
> +	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_X &&
> +	    c->x86_mask == 0x01 && intel_get_microcode_revision() < 0x0b000021U) {

Actually, you shouldn't need to call intel_get_microcode_revision() here
as collect_cpu_info() has done that already and the revision is in

	c->microcode

unless you're using the old method through do_microcode_update() and
for that you'll need to call collect_cpu_info() over all CPUs in
microcode_open().

So how do you update your microcode?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ