[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_Ue30XqQ4sok34U0rjcsfkN1caACzQN3En71Hmd6Kc3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 21:09:48 +0000
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] arch: enable relative relocations for arm64,
power, x86, s390 and x86
On 25 December 2017 at 21:05, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> Hi Ard.
>
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 08:54:33PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Before updating certain subsystems to use place relative 32-bit
>> relocations in special sections, to save space and reduce the
>> number of absolute relocations that need to be processed at runtime
>> by relocatable kernels, introduce the Kconfig symbol and define it
>> for some architectures that should be able to support and benefit
>> from it.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: x86@...nel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
>
>> arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 2 +-
> The change to arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S is
> not justified in the changelog.
> Did you add it by mistake?
>
No. The PREL32 support adds a __ADDRESSABLE() macro that emits code
into .discard.text, and on arm64, the EFI object sections get a .init
prefix so we need to discard .init.discard.* explicitly as well.
I will add this as a note.
Thanks,
Ard.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists