[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171225094746.bcbmqqyjiaioo7lh@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 10:47:46 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Alexandru Chirvasitu <achirvasub@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: consolidated IDT invalidation causes kexec to reboot
* Alexandru Chirvasitu <achirvasub@...il.com> wrote:
> The first attachment is the config I initially used last night after
> that second patch (removing 'local' etc.).
>
> As you guessed, all four options are set, hence the name of the file
> (ending in '-y'). The other config I'm attaching was treated as you
> lay out (2-config-n).
>
> I used the '-n' config to compile two kernels just now:
>
> (a) e802a51, that same first commit giving me trouble.
>
> The changes made no difference to kexec behaviour: with the e802a51
> kernel calling kexec boot directly with -e and triggering a panic both
> kick off a full reboot, though the crash kernel registers as loaded.
>
> (b) the kernel in the branch I made last night, with the set_idt kexec
> (for good measure, I thought I might as well do this one too).
>
> No difference here either: the crash dump kernel boots fine both ways
> (directly and upon intentional crashing).
Thanks for all the info!
Detailed analysis from me (or Thomas) will have to wait after the Christmas
hollidays.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists