lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <DB6PR04MB32218D8A75D4D9F6CB2D2F3C88060@DB6PR04MB3221.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 06:52:45 +0000 From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> CC: "A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "Fabio Estevam" <fabio.estevam@....com>, Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>, "van.freenix@...il.com" <van.freenix@...il.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm: imx: suspend/resume: use outer_disable/resume Hi Shawn, > -----Original Message----- > From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo@...nel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 11:31 AM > To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> > Cc: A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Russell > King <linux@...linux.org.uk>; Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>; > Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>; van.freenix@...il.com; linux-arm- > kernel@...ts.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: imx: suspend/resume: use outer_disable/resume > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 08:07:18PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > > Use outer_disable/resume for suspend/resume. > > With the two APIs used, code could be simplified and easy to extend to > > introduce l2c_write_sec for i.MX platforms when moving Linux Kernel > > runs in non-secure world. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> > > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de> > > Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com> > > Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk> > > Cc: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com> > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c | 2 ++ > > arch/arm/mach-imx/suspend-imx6.S | 24 ------------------------ > > I'm fine with the patch in general. But this piece of code is running on a few > i.MX6 platforms, and I'm wondering on which SoCs you have verified the > change work fine. I tested it on 6Q-SDB board. Is it ok? Thanks, Peng. > > Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists