[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30d0f7f4-8f93-de23-83b7-72a9c8d4a47f@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 17:36:01 +0800
From: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<ysxie@...mail.com>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
<linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3,21/27] watchdog: replace devm_ioremap_nocache with
devm_ioremap
Hi Guenter,
On 2017/12/27 1:28, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 07:01:37PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> > Default ioremap is ioremap_nocache, so devm_ioremap has the same
>> > function with devm_ioremap_nocache, which can just be killed to
>> > save the size of devres.o
>> >
>> > This patch is to use use devm_ioremap instead of devm_ioremap_nocache,
>> > which should not have any function change but prepare for killing
>> > devm_ioremap_nocache.
>> >
> I don't have issues with the patch itself - on mips, the definitions
> _are_ the same - but with the description. It is not universally correct
> that the definitions are the same. Please update and resubmit.
>
Right, there are 4 archs have different meaning of ioremap. And presently, I
still do not know why.
For this patch itself, maybe I can update and resubmit.
Thanks and Merry Christmas.
Yisheng
> Guenter
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists