lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5A4372AA.1080007@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Dec 2017 18:15:06 +0800
From:   piaojun <piaojun@...wei.com>
To:     Gang He <ghe@...e.com>, <mfasheh@...sity.com>, <jlbec@...lplan.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: try a blocking lock before return
 AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE

Hi Gang,

Do you mean that too many retrys in loop cast losts of CPU-time and
block page-fault interrupt? We should not add any delay in
ocfs2_fault(), right? And I still feel a little confused why your
method can solve this problem.

thanks,
Jun

On 2017/12/27 17:29, Gang He wrote:
> If we can't get inode lock immediately in the function
> ocfs2_inode_lock_with_page() when reading a page, we should not
> return directly here, since this will lead to a softlockup problem.
> The method is to get a blocking lock and immediately unlock before
> returning, this can avoid CPU resource waste due to lots of retries,
> and benefits fairness in getting lock among multiple nodes, increase
> efficiency in case modifying the same file frequently from multiple
> nodes.
> The softlockup problem looks like,
> Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks
> CPU: 0 PID: 885 Comm: multi_mmap Tainted: G L 4.12.14-6.1-default #1
> Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
>   <IRQ>
>   dump_stack+0x5c/0x82
>   panic+0xd5/0x21e
>   watchdog_timer_fn+0x208/0x210
>   ? watchdog_park_threads+0x70/0x70
>   __hrtimer_run_queues+0xcc/0x200
>   hrtimer_interrupt+0xa6/0x1f0
>   smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x34/0x50
>   apic_timer_interrupt+0x96/0xa0
>   </IRQ>
>  RIP: 0010:unlock_page+0x17/0x30
>  RSP: 0000:ffffaf154080bc88 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff10
>  RAX: dead000000000100 RBX: fffff21e009f5300 RCX: 0000000000000004
>  RDX: dead0000000000ff RSI: 0000000000000202 RDI: fffff21e009f5300
>  RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffaf154080bb00
>  R10: ffffaf154080bc30 R11: 0000000000000040 R12: ffff993749a39518
>  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: fffff21e009f5300 R15: fffff21e009f5300
>   ocfs2_inode_lock_with_page+0x25/0x30 [ocfs2]
>   ocfs2_readpage+0x41/0x2d0 [ocfs2]
>   ? pagecache_get_page+0x30/0x200
>   filemap_fault+0x12b/0x5c0
>   ? recalc_sigpending+0x17/0x50
>   ? __set_task_blocked+0x28/0x70
>   ? __set_current_blocked+0x3d/0x60
>   ocfs2_fault+0x29/0xb0 [ocfs2]
>   __do_fault+0x1a/0xa0
>   __handle_mm_fault+0xbe8/0x1090
>   handle_mm_fault+0xaa/0x1f0
>   __do_page_fault+0x235/0x4b0
>   trace_do_page_fault+0x3c/0x110
>   async_page_fault+0x28/0x30
>  RIP: 0033:0x7fa75ded638e
>  RSP: 002b:00007ffd6657db18 EFLAGS: 00010287
>  RAX: 000055c7662fb700 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 000055c7662fb700
>  RDX: 0000000000001770 RSI: 00007fa75e909000 RDI: 000055c7662fb700
>  RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 000000000000000e R09: 0000000000000000
>  R10: 0000000000000483 R11: 00007fa75ded61b0 R12: 00007fa75e90a770
>  R13: 000000000000000e R14: 0000000000001770 R15: 0000000000000000
> 
> Fixes: 1cce4df04f37 ("ocfs2: do not lock/unlock() inode DLM lock")
> Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@...e.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> index 4689940..5193218 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> @@ -2486,6 +2486,15 @@ int ocfs2_inode_lock_with_page(struct inode *inode,
>  	ret = ocfs2_inode_lock_full(inode, ret_bh, ex, OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK);
>  	if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
>  		unlock_page(page);
> +		/*
> +		 * If we can't get inode lock immediately, we should not return
> +		 * directly here, since this will lead to a softlockup problem.
> +		 * The method is to get a blocking lock and immediately unlock
> +		 * before returning, this can avoid CPU resource waste due to
> +		 * lots of retries, and benefits fairness in getting lock.
> +		 */
> +		if (ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, ret_bh, ex) == 0)
> +			ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, ex);
>  		ret = AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE;
>  	}
>  
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ