lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:19:36 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     sean.wang@...iatek.com
Cc:     mturquette@...libre.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com, jdelvare@...e.de,
        jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com, weiyi.lu@...iatek.com,
        kevin-cw.chen@...iatek.com, shunli.wang@...iatek.com,
        chen.zhong@...iatek.com, arnd@...db.de,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: adjust dependency of reset.c to avoid
 unexpectedly being built

On 12/26, sean.wang@...iatek.com wrote:
> From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> 
> commit 74cb0d6dde8 ("clk: mediatek: fixup test-building of MediaTek clock
> drivers") can let the build system looking into the directory where the
> clock drivers resides and then allow test-building the drivers.
> 
> But the change also gives rise to certain incorrect behavior which is
> reset.c being built even not depending on either COMPILE_TEST or
> ARCH_MEDIATEK alternative dependency. To get rid of reset.c being built
> unexpectedly on the other platforms, it would be a good change that the
> file should be built depending on its own specific configuration rather
> than just on generic RESET_CONTROLLER one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>

I've typically seen vendor Kconfigs select the RESET_CONTROLLER
framework if the vendor Kconfig is enabled. Any reason that same
method isn't followed here?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ