[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5A437DED.3030703@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:33:09 +0530
From: arvindY <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: nsekhar@...com, khilman@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
kaloz@...nwrt.org, khalasa@...p.pl, aaro.koskinen@....fi,
tony@...mide.com, jason@...edaemon.net, andrew@...n.ch,
sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, daniel@...que.org,
haojian.zhuang@...il.com, marek.vasut@...il.com,
slapin@...fans.org, jic23@....ac.uk, kgene@...nel.org,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, dalias@...c.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11 v3] ARM: s3c24xx/s3c64xx: constify gpio_led
Hi,
On Wednesday 27 December 2017 01:49 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com> wrote:
>> gpio_led are not supposed to change at runtime.
>> struct gpio_led_platform_data working with const gpio_led
>> provided by <linux/leds.h>. So mark the non-const structs
>> as const.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
>> ---
>> changes in v2:
>> The GPIO LED driver can be built as a module, it can
>> be loaded after the init sections have gone away.
>> So removed '__initconst'.
>> changes in v3:
>> Description was missing.
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-h1940.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-hmt.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq5.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq7.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c | 2 +-
>> 6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> There were few build errors reported by kbuild for your patches. Are
> you sure that you compiled every file you touch?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Yes, I got few build error which I have fixed it. and send updated patch.
Now I have done cross checking. It's not having any build failure.
Regards
arvind
Powered by blists - more mailing lists