lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 27 Dec 2017 12:44:26 +0100
From:   Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>,
        adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] blackfin: defconfig: Cleanup from old Kconfig
 options

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:29:33PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Remove old, dead Kconfig options (in order appearing in this commit):
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> 
> This architecture is becoming a burden :/
> 
> Last blackfin pull request was in June 2014 by Steven Miao.

April 2015, actually.  Doesn't change the conclusion, though.

> Steven, what's up with this? I don't mind the arch/blackfin as much
> as the plethora of boardfiles that need to be maintained as soon as
> we change some platform data or so, and it's just a mystery whether
> things really get tested and any of the changes made here since 2014
> are screwing up the blackfin. No ACKs or Tested-by's ever appear.
> 
> Is there active testing of mainline with blackfin?

After multiple pings, I just (two days ago) sent the following:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151421639229901

So even if there's no actual testing, at the very least it'd be good to mark
the architecture as orphaned, so people don't wait for ACKs that never come.


Meow!
-- 
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets.  Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ