[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171227164615.491625044@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 17:46:08 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 35/74] crypto: skcipher - set walk.iv for zero-length inputs
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
commit 2b4f27c36bcd46e820ddb9a8e6fe6a63fa4250b8 upstream.
All the ChaCha20 algorithms as well as the ARM bit-sliced AES-XTS
algorithms call skcipher_walk_virt(), then access the IV (walk.iv)
before checking whether any bytes need to be processed (walk.nbytes).
But if the input is empty, then skcipher_walk_virt() doesn't set the IV,
and the algorithms crash trying to use the uninitialized IV pointer.
Fix it by setting the IV earlier in skcipher_walk_virt(). Also fix it
for the AEAD walk functions.
This isn't a perfect solution because we can't actually align the IV to
->cra_alignmask unless there are bytes to process, for one because the
temporary buffer for the aligned IV is freed by skcipher_walk_done(),
which is only called when there are bytes to process. Thus, algorithms
that require aligned IVs will still need to avoid accessing the IV when
walk.nbytes == 0. Still, many algorithms/architectures are fine with
IVs having any alignment, and even for those that aren't, a misaligned
pointer bug is much less severe than an uninitialized pointer bug.
This change also matches the behavior of the older blkcipher_walk API.
Fixes: 0cabf2af6f5a ("crypto: skcipher - Fix crash on zero-length input")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
crypto/skcipher.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/crypto/skcipher.c
+++ b/crypto/skcipher.c
@@ -449,6 +449,8 @@ static int skcipher_walk_skcipher(struct
walk->total = req->cryptlen;
walk->nbytes = 0;
+ walk->iv = req->iv;
+ walk->oiv = req->iv;
if (unlikely(!walk->total))
return 0;
@@ -456,9 +458,6 @@ static int skcipher_walk_skcipher(struct
scatterwalk_start(&walk->in, req->src);
scatterwalk_start(&walk->out, req->dst);
- walk->iv = req->iv;
- walk->oiv = req->iv;
-
walk->flags &= ~SKCIPHER_WALK_SLEEP;
walk->flags |= req->base.flags & CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP ?
SKCIPHER_WALK_SLEEP : 0;
@@ -510,6 +509,8 @@ static int skcipher_walk_aead_common(str
int err;
walk->nbytes = 0;
+ walk->iv = req->iv;
+ walk->oiv = req->iv;
if (unlikely(!walk->total))
return 0;
@@ -525,9 +526,6 @@ static int skcipher_walk_aead_common(str
scatterwalk_done(&walk->in, 0, walk->total);
scatterwalk_done(&walk->out, 0, walk->total);
- walk->iv = req->iv;
- walk->oiv = req->iv;
-
if (req->base.flags & CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP)
walk->flags |= SKCIPHER_WALK_SLEEP;
else
Powered by blists - more mailing lists