lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqGsLxCTk_dA_rywvF+i1UuYiYdTLEqmsKAo1zO94gWSyA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 11:33:04 -0800 From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com> To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>, Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: imx6: RDU2: correct RTC compatible On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Andrey Smirnov > <andrew.smirnov@...il.com> wrote: >> The RTC is manufactured by Maxim. This is a cosmetic fix, as Linux >> doesn't match the vendor string for i2c devices. >> >> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de> >> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com> >> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org >> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org >> Cc: cphealy@...il.com >> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de> >> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com> > > This patch seems to be from Lucas: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10099397/ > > ,so his name should appear in the From field. > > Anyway, this patch has been sent earlier and we suggested to keep the > existing binding, which is the documented form: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10099397/ Yes, the patch is from Lucas and I was just being a messenger. And understood and thanks for the info. Sorry for the noise and disregard this patch. Thanks, Andrey Smirnov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists