linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Device tree binding for Avago APDS990X light sensor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171227200147.GB16799@amd>
Date:   Wed, 27 Dec 2017 21:01:47 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org,
        aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
        patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, abcloriens@...il.com,
        clayton@...ftyguy.net, martijn@...xit.nl,
        Filip Matijević <filip.matijevic.pz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Device tree binding for Avago APDS990X light sensor

Hi!

> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: "avago,apds990x"
> > +- reg: address on the I2C bus
> > +- interrupts: external interrupt line number
> > +- Vdd-supply: power supply for VDD
> > +- Vled-supply: power supply for LEDA
> 
> AFAIK the custom is to use lower case letters for regulator supplies.
> 
> > +- ga: Glass attenuation
> > +- cf1: Clear channel factor 1
> > +- irf1: IR channel factor 1
> > +- cf2: Clear channel factor 2
> > +- irf2: IR channel factor 2
> > +- df: Device factor
> > +- pdrive: IR current, one of APDS_IRLED_CURR_XXXmA values
> > +- ppcount: Proximity pulse count
> 
> Are these device specific? If so, please add the vendor prefix to them.

Well, whole binding is "vendor specific". Does it make sense to add
prefix in such case?

> I might not use short abbreviations such as "df" either. I wonder what
> others think.

I see.

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)