lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzygF6P3v5VxyBucZfn-tg58jeV6qwt0y7QGmmNiKYghQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 12:13:39 -0800 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] module: use relative references for __ksymtab entries On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote: > > I tried to keep the generic patches generic, so perhaps I should just > put the arm64 vmlinux.lds.S change in a patch on its own? I guess it doesn't matter, but regardless of where it gets introduced I would like to see the explanation for where the heck that magical ".init.discard.text" comes from. It's definitely not obvious from the patches, and is presumably some odd arm64 special case. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists