lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20171227071056.GA471@jagdpanzerIV> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:10:56 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> To: Gopi Sai Teja <gopi.st@...sung.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, ngupta@...are.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, v.narang@...sung.com, pankaj.m@...sung.com, a.sahrawat@...sung.com, prakash.a@...sung.com, himanshu.sh@...sung.com, lalit.mohan@...sung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] zram: better utilization of zram swap space On (12/27/17 15:29), Minchan Kim wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 04:00:06PM +0530, Gopi Sai Teja wrote: > > 75% of the PAGE_SIZE is not a correct threshold to store uncompressed > > Please describe it in detail that why current threshold is bad in that > memory efficiency point of view. > > > pages in zs_page as this must be changed if the maximum pages stored > > in zspage changes. Instead using zs classes, we can set the correct > > Also, let's include the pharase Sergey pointed out in this description. > > It's not a good idea that zram need to know allocator's implementation > with harded value like 75%. so I don't like that, basically, my work and my findings are now submitted by someone else without even crediting my work. not to mention that I like my commit message much better. -ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists