lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:10:56 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Gopi Sai Teja <gopi.st@...sung.com>
Cc:     Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, ngupta@...are.org,
        sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, v.narang@...sung.com,
        pankaj.m@...sung.com, a.sahrawat@...sung.com,
        prakash.a@...sung.com, himanshu.sh@...sung.com,
        lalit.mohan@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] zram: better utilization of zram swap space

On (12/27/17 15:29), Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 04:00:06PM +0530, Gopi Sai Teja wrote:
> > 75% of the PAGE_SIZE is not a correct threshold to store uncompressed
> 
> Please describe it in detail that why current threshold is bad in that
> memory efficiency point of view.
> 
> > pages in zs_page as this must be changed if the maximum pages stored
> > in zspage changes. Instead using zs classes, we can set the correct
> 
> Also, let's include the pharase Sergey pointed out in this description.
> 
> It's not a good idea that zram need to know allocator's implementation
> with harded value like 75%.

so I don't like that, basically, my work and my findings are
now submitted by someone else without even crediting my work.
not to mention that I like my commit message much better.

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ