linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI: mediatek: Clear IRQ status after IRQ dispatched to avoid reentry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1514336394-17747-2-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:59:53 +0800
From:   <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com>
To:     <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>, <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
        <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC:     <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com>, <hongkun.cao@...iatek.com>,
        <youlin.pei@...iatek.com>, <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
        <yt.shen@...iatek.com>, <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        <xinping.qian@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI: mediatek: Clear IRQ status after IRQ dispatched to avoid reentry

From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com>

There maybe a same IRQ reentry scenario after IRQ received in current
IRQ handle flow:
	EP device		PCIe host driver	EP driver
1. issue an IRQ
			2. received IRQ
			3. clear IRQ status
			4. dispatch IRQ
						5. clear IRQ source
The IRQ status was not successfully cleared at step 2 since the IRQ
source was not cleared yet. So the PCIe host driver may receive the
same IRQ after step 5. Then there's an IRQ reentry occurred.
Even worse, if the reentry IRQ was not an IRQ that EP driver expected,
it may not handle the IRQ. Then we may run into the infinite loop from
step 2 to step 4.
Clear the IRQ status after IRQ have been dispatched to avoid the IRQ
reentry.
This patch also fix another INTx IRQ issue by initialize the iterate
before the loop. If an INTx IRQ re-occurred while we are dispatching
the INTx IRQ, then iterate may start from PCI_NUM_INTX + INTX_SHIFT
instead of INTX_SHIFT for the second time entering the
for_each_set_bit_from() loop.

Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com>
Acked-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>
---
 drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
index db93efd..fc29a9a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
@@ -601,15 +601,16 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
 	struct mtk_pcie_port *port = (struct mtk_pcie_port *)data;
 	unsigned long status;
 	u32 virq;
-	u32 bit = INTX_SHIFT;
+	u32 bit;
 
 	while ((status = readl(port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS)) & INTX_MASK) {
+		bit = INTX_SHIFT;
 		for_each_set_bit_from(bit, &status, PCI_NUM_INTX + INTX_SHIFT) {
-			/* Clear the INTx */
-			writel(1 << bit, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS);
 			virq = irq_find_mapping(port->irq_domain,
 						bit - INTX_SHIFT);
 			generic_handle_irq(virq);
+			/* Clear the INTx */
+			writel(1 << bit, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -619,10 +620,10 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
 
 			while ((imsi_status = readl(port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS))) {
 				for_each_set_bit(bit, &imsi_status, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM) {
-					/* Clear the MSI */
-					writel(1 << bit, port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS);
 					virq = irq_find_mapping(port->msi_domain, bit);
 					generic_handle_irq(virq);
+					/* Clear the MSI */
+					writel(1 << bit, port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS);
 				}
 			}
 			/* Clear MSI interrupt status */
-- 
2.6.4