linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: winbond: add driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZWzodfpWGG2=KJDupi0WGBRJof9aj6axX+LVSDq73tiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Dec 2017 13:52:10 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Cc:     "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: winbond: add driver

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:33 AM, William Breathitt Gray
<vilhelm.gray@...il.com> wrote:

> Given that CONFIG_PC104 now fulfills the original purpose of adding
> ISA_BUS_API to the depends on line for the PC/104 device drivers, and
> that ISA_BUS_API can be selected as necessary with no danger to the
> integrity of the system, I think it would be appropriate to change all
> the existing ISA_BUS_API depends on lines to respective select lines.
> Does that logic make sense?

I'm *BAD* at Kconfig.

But it makes sense to me. I just suspect that if you turn these into selects,
you will see the same thing that Maciej is seeing and then you get to deal
with it :D

So by all means, try it out!

Yours,
Linus Walleij