[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba1bc259-9db7-64d8-f136-c889d2c967e0@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 19:18:33 +0300
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tipbuild@...or.com,
LKP <lkp@...org>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/cpu_entry_area] 10043e02db:
kernel_BUG_at_arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c
On 12/28/2017 02:54 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>>>> So this dies simply because kasan_populate_shadow() runs out of memory and
>>>> has no sanity check whatsoever.
>>>>
>>>> static __init void *early_alloc(size_t size, int nid)
>>>> {
>>>> return memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_nopanic(size, size,
>>>> __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS), BOOTMEM_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> kasan_populate_pmd()
>>>> {
>>>> .....
>>>>
>>>> p = early_alloc(PAGE_SIZE, nid);
>>>> entry = pfn_pte(PFN_DOWN(__pa(p)), PAGE_KERNEL);
>>>>
>>>> I've instrumented the whole thing and early_alloc() returns NULL at some
>>>> point and then __pa(NULL) dies in the VIRTUAL_DEBUG code. Well, it would
>>>> die with VIRTUAL_DEBUG=n as well at some other place.
>>>>
>>>> Not really a problem caused by the patch above, it's merily exposing a code
>>>> path which relies blindly on "enough memory available" assumptions.
>>>>
>>>> Throwing more memory at the VM makes the problem go away...
>>>
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> We just need a check inside of early_alloc() to properly diagnose such
>>> situation, right?
>>
>> At least you want to panic with a proper out of memory message. But letting
>> the thing die at a random place is a bad idea.
>
> Thanks. I will cook a patch (if Andrey won't beat me to it).
>
We probably should panic only if PAGE_SIZE allocation failed. PUD_SIZE,PMD_SIZE allocations have
failure fallback. I would suggest add 'bool panic' param to early_alloc() and call
memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid() if it's true.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists