[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+7wUszznjvTN9SAofB7BMOiXrYb_5TZhhsJ5QMAmfoTSybNUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 18:23:48 +0100
From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf/core: Move inline keyword at the beginning of declaration
Hi Ingo,
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org> wrote:
>
>> Fix non-fatal warnings such as:
>>
>> kernel/events/ring_buffer.c:116:1: warning: ‘inline’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
>> static int __always_inline
>> ^~~~~~
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
>> ---
>> kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Hm, never saw this warning before - is this a newly default GCC warning, or some
> distro CFLAGS build that enables it?
Nope. Just compiling vanilla kernel with default options, defconfig
was pmac32. I used W=1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists