[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1514480352.86244284@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:59:12 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Chris Metcalf" <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 01/94] tile: array underflow in setup_maxnodemem()
3.2.97-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
commit 637f23abca87d26e091e0d6647ec878d97d2c6cd upstream.
My static checker correctly complains that we should have a lower bound
on "node" to prevent an array underflow.
Fixes: 867e359b97c9 ("arch/tile: core support for Tilera 32-bit chips.")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: keep maxnodemem_mb as long]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/arch/tile/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/tile/kernel/setup.c
@@ -119,7 +119,8 @@ early_param("maxmem", setup_maxmem);
static int __init setup_maxnodemem(char *str)
{
char *endp;
- long maxnodemem_mb, node;
+ long maxnodemem_mb;
+ unsigned long node;
node = str ? simple_strtoul(str, &endp, 0) : INT_MAX;
if (node >= MAX_NUMNODES || *endp != ':' ||
Powered by blists - more mailing lists