lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Dec 2017 21:31:11 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     "alan@...ux.intel.com" <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Ailus, Sakari" <sakari.ailus@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IRQ behaivour has been changed from v4.14 to v4.15-rc1

On Thu, 2017-12-28 at 18:44 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-12-28 at 18:21 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > [   85.167061] spurious APIC interrupt through vector ff on
> > > > CPU#0,
> > > > should never happen.
> > > > [   85.199886] atomisp-isp2 0000:00:03.0: stream[0] started.
> > > > 
> > > > and Ctrl+C does NOT work. Machine just hangs.
> > > > 
> > > > It might be related to this:
> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/22/697
> > > 
> > > I don't think so.
> > > 
> > > Does the patch below cure it?
> > 
> > Unfortunately, no.
> > 
> > Same behaviour.
> > 
> > Tell me if I need to provide some debug before it hangs. For now I
> > have
> > apic=debug (AFAIR it doesn't affect this).
> 
> The interesting question is why that spurious APIC interrupt through
> vector
> ff happens. Can you please add the following to the kernel command
> line:
> 
>  'trace_events=irq_vectors:* ftrace_dump_on_oops'
> 
> and apply the patch below. That should spill out the trace over serial
> (I
> hope you have that ...)

With or without CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=y I have got


[   28.977918] Dumping ftrace buffer:
[   28.988115]    (ftrace buffer empty)

followed by BUG() output.

...
[   28.930154] RIP: 0010:smp_spurious_interrupt+0x67/0xb0
...


Anything I missed?

P.S. I didn't apply your previous patch.

> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
> 
> 8<---------------
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -1978,6 +1978,8 @@ void __init register_lapic_address(unsig
>  	/* see sw-dev-man vol 3, chapter 7.4.13.5 */
>  	pr_info("spurious APIC interrupt through vector %02x on
> CPU#%d, "
>  		"should never happen.\n", vector,
> smp_processor_id());
> +	tracing_off();
> +	BUG();
>  
>  	trace_spurious_apic_exit(vector);
>  	exiting_irq();
> 

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ