linux-kernel - Re: ftrace/module: Move ftrace_release_mod to ddebug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171228195741.0c14e446@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Thu, 28 Dec 2017 19:57:41 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
Cc:     Namit Gupta <gupta.namit@...sung.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pankaj.m@...sung.com,
        a.sahrawat@...sung.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: ftrace/module: Move ftrace_release_mod to ddebug_cleanup label

On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:36:48 +0100
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org> wrote:

> +++ Steven Rostedt [28/12/17 11:32 -0500]:
> >
> >Jessica,
> >
> >Can you take this patch. You can add:
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>  
> 
> Sure, thanks Steven.
> 
> Namit, your patch does not apply cleanly to modules-next nor
> linux-next. It looks like you based your patch on an old tree?
> (e.g., we got rid of the module_core and core_size fields a few years
> ago...) Could you please rebase your patch on linux-next and resend? 

I should probably re-review the rebased patch.

-- Steve