[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5dd0d53-2014-a967-03c3-05ff8a1cc05d@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:23:39 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bastian Stender <bst@...gutronix.de>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [0/2] video: ssd1307fb: Adjustments for ssd1307fb_probe()
>> Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation
>
> This patch removes the information about the device for which the allocation fails.
How do you think about to take another look if a Linux allocation failure report
could be sufficient in this use case?
>> Improve a size determination
>
> This patch depends on the earlier patch (which is not being merged)
Partly, yes.
> so please re-base it if you want it to be applied.
Would you dare to reduce any context lines for this update step so that
such a small adjustment will still work?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists