[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1514578936.28262.11.camel@tsoy.me>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 23:22:16 +0300
From: Alexander Tsoy <alexander@...y.me>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Liguori, Anthony" <aliguori@...zon.com>,
Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.14.9 with CONFIG_MCORE2 fails to boot
В Пт, 29/12/2017 в 11:31 -0800, Linus Torvalds пишет:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
>
--------------->%---------------
> >
> > MCORE2 seems to get one oddball compiler flag (-march=core2):
> >
> > > cflags-$(CONFIG_MCORE2) += \
> > > $(call cc-option,-march=core2,$(call cc-option,-
> > > mtune=generic))
> >
> > It would be interesting to see if replacing the above "$(call"
> > with:
> >
> > $(call cc-option,-mtune=generic)
> >
> > makes the problem go away the same way as changing the .config
> > option.
>
> Definitely.
>
--------------->%---------------
> But double-checking that "-march=core2" case is definitely worth
> looking into. Especially since there are clear indications that it's
> gcc version-dependent anyway. Alexander?
>
Yes, the change suggested by Dave makes the problem go away.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists