linux-kernel - Re: 4.14.9 doesn't boot (regression)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1514585080.28262.16.camel@tsoy.me>
Date:   Sat, 30 Dec 2017 01:04:40 +0300
From:   Alexander Tsoy <alexander@...y.me>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.14.9 doesn't boot (regression)

В Пт, 29/12/2017 в 13:39 -0800, Linus Torvalds пишет:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Yeah, other reporters of this have used gcc-6.4.0 too.
> > 
> > But there's been some muddying of the waters there too - changing
> > compilers have fixed it for some cases, but there's at least one
> > report that a kernel build with gcc-7.2.0 still had the issue (and
> > another that said it didn't).
> 
> Side note: I'm not convinced that we will reliably catch a compiler
> version change in our dependency analysis, so it's probably best to
> "make clean" between switching compilers to make sure that you don't
> have old object files with the old compiler.

I did "make clean" after changing compiler flags.