[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171229001519.GD19819@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 18:15:19 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Alexandru Chirvasitu <achirvasub@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux@...il.com>,
Josh Poulson <jopoulso@...rosoft.com>,
Mihai Costache <v-micos@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Simon Xiao <sixiao@...rosoft.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@...rosoft.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 4.15.0-rc3 APIC causes lockups on Core 2 Duo laptop
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 06:30:58PM -0500, Alexandru Chirvasitu wrote:
> Attached, but heads up on this: when redirecting the output of lspci
> -vvv to a text file as root I get
>
> pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Input/output error
>
> I can find bugs filed for various distros to this same effect, but
> haven't tracked down any explanations.
This is a tangent, but I think you should *always* see "Input/output
error" on this system when running "lspci -vvv" as root, regardless of
whether you redirect the output (the error probably goes to stderr,
not stdout, so it's probably easy to miss when not redirecting the
output).
I think this is the -EIO return from pci_vpd_read(), which probably
means pci_vpd_size() returned 0 for one of your devices, which means
the VPD data provided by the device wasn't formatted correctly. If
this happens, you should see a warning in dmesg about it ("invalid VPD
tag" or similar) -- could you verify that?
It's possible we should return something other than -EIO, or maybe
pcilib should do something other than emitting the warning. In
pcilib, sysfs_read_vpd() emits the warning [1], and it would seem sort
of ugly to special-case EIO, so maybe we should change this in the
kernel.
It looks like your Qualcomm Atheros Attansic NIC at 06:00.0 is the
only device with VPD, so that's probably the one:
06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Qualcomm Atheros Attansic L2 Fast Ethernet
Capabilities: [6c] Vital Product Data
Not readable
I think lspci would still print "Not readable" if we just made the
kernel return 0 instead of -EIO [2].
Bjorn
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/pciutils/pciutils.git/tree/lib/sysfs.c#n410
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/pciutils/pciutils.git/tree/ls-vpd.c#n87
Powered by blists - more mailing lists