linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: Allow indicating loss of pin states during low-power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8890917a-67e2-6ec6-690f-0121d5de4103@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 30 Dec 2017 11:31:19 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: Allow indicating loss of pin states
 during low-power

Le 12/19/17 à 23:24, Linus Walleij a écrit :
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 12/02/2017 04:48 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 
>>> This should solve your problem without having to alter the semantics
>>> of pinctrl_select_state() for everyone.
>>
>> This was exactly what I proposed initially here:
>>
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/734326/
>>
>> I really want to get this fixed, but I can't do that if we keep losing
>> the context of the discussion (pun intended) :).
> 
> Oh sorry man. I am clearly too stupid for this job...

No need to slap yourself!

> 
> In accordance with things needing to be intuitive, something named
> *force_* should of course force the setting into the hardware.
> 
> The original patch didn't mention the fact that it was hogs
> and hogs only that was causing the trouble and that is why I
> got lost. (I guess.) I have been going about this as if it was
> something generic that affect all states in all devices, and to
> me hogs is just an abscure corner of pin controlling...
> 
> I applied the patchwork patch from above, and elaborated
> a bit on that it pertains to hogs, let's see what
> happens.
> 
> For the case where a driver (not hog) needs to handle
> suspend/resume transitions, proper states can hopefully
> be used.

Your commit message makes that clear now, thanks for applying the patch
and gott nytt år!
-- 
Florian