[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcFFfMp=nNDNyN3SNHnFXXXGGCobtKL2xaP+OqefmH5JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 14:07:10 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Chi-Hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com>,
Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ress.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"open list:TI WILINK WIRELES..." <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211 IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER"
<brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Use zeroing memory allocator than allocator/memset
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Himanshu Jha
<himanshujha199640@...il.com> wrote:
> Use dma_zalloc_coherent for allocating zeroed
> memory and remove unnecessary memset function.
>
> Done using Coccinelle.
> Generated-by: scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/kzalloc-simple.cocci
> 0-day tested with no failures.
>
Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> Suggested-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
> ---
> .../net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
> index 3c87157..bdef2ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
> @@ -1251,14 +1251,13 @@ static int brcmf_pcie_init_scratchbuffers(struct brcmf_pciedev_info *devinfo)
> u64 address;
> u32 addr;
>
> - devinfo->shared.scratch = dma_alloc_coherent(&devinfo->pdev->dev,
> - BRCMF_DMA_D2H_SCRATCH_BUF_LEN,
> - &devinfo->shared.scratch_dmahandle, GFP_KERNEL);
> + devinfo->shared.scratch =
> + dma_zalloc_coherent(&devinfo->pdev->dev,
> + BRCMF_DMA_D2H_SCRATCH_BUF_LEN,
> + &devinfo->shared.scratch_dmahandle,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!devinfo->shared.scratch)
> goto fail;
>
> - memset(devinfo->shared.scratch, 0, BRCMF_DMA_D2H_SCRATCH_BUF_LEN);
> -
> addr = devinfo->shared.tcm_base_address +
> BRCMF_SHARED_DMA_SCRATCH_ADDR_OFFSET;
> address = (u64)devinfo->shared.scratch_dmahandle;
> @@ -1268,14 +1267,13 @@ static int brcmf_pcie_init_scratchbuffers(struct brcmf_pciedev_info *devinfo)
> BRCMF_SHARED_DMA_SCRATCH_LEN_OFFSET;
> brcmf_pcie_write_tcm32(devinfo, addr, BRCMF_DMA_D2H_SCRATCH_BUF_LEN);
>
> - devinfo->shared.ringupd = dma_alloc_coherent(&devinfo->pdev->dev,
> - BRCMF_DMA_D2H_RINGUPD_BUF_LEN,
> - &devinfo->shared.ringupd_dmahandle, GFP_KERNEL);
> + devinfo->shared.ringupd =
> + dma_zalloc_coherent(&devinfo->pdev->dev,
> + BRCMF_DMA_D2H_RINGUPD_BUF_LEN,
> + &devinfo->shared.ringupd_dmahandle,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!devinfo->shared.ringupd)
> goto fail;
>
> - memset(devinfo->shared.ringupd, 0, BRCMF_DMA_D2H_RINGUPD_BUF_LEN);
> -
> addr = devinfo->shared.tcm_base_address +
> BRCMF_SHARED_DMA_RINGUPD_ADDR_OFFSET;
> address = (u64)devinfo->shared.ringupd_dmahandle;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists