linux-kernel - Re: [net-next: PATCH v2 4/5] net: mvpp2: use device_*/fwnode_* APIs instead of of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPv3WKfiR_ekc-ODPfYWDkP0UG0znRxsTCr6FPePgZVXB5J_zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Jan 2018 11:04:30 +0100
From:   Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Gregory Clément 
        <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
        nadavh@...vell.com, Neta Zur Hershkovits <neta@...vell.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH v2 4/5] net: mvpp2: use device_*/fwnode_* APIs
 instead of of_*

Hi Andrew,

2017-12-31 20:18 GMT+01:00 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 12:58:39PM +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> Hi Marcin
>
>> Because there is no equivalent for for_each_available_child_of_node(),
>> use device_for_each_child_node() and check the port availability
>> inside the mvpp2_port_probe() routine.
>
> Could device_each_available_child_node() be added? I guess this will
> not be the last driver converted in this way, and having that macro
> will help with future ports.
>

Sure, I can add it in the next round.

Thanks,
Marcin