| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 15:32:23 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Yousuk Seung <ysseung@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Priyaranjan Jha <priyarjha@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 46/75] tcp: invalidate rate samples during SACK reneging
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yousuk Seung <ysseung@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit d4761754b4fb2ef8d9a1e9d121c4bec84e1fe292 ]
Mark tcp_sock during a SACK reneging event and invalidate rate samples
while marked. Such rate samples may overestimate bw by including packets
that were SACKed before reneging.
< ack 6001 win 10000 sack 7001:38001
< ack 7001 win 0 sack 8001:38001 // Reneg detected
> seq 7001:8001 // RTO, SACK cleared.
< ack 38001 win 10000
In above example the rate sample taken after the last ack will count
7001-38001 as delivered while the actual delivery rate likely could
be much lower i.e. 7001-8001.
This patch adds a new field tcp_sock.sack_reneg and marks it when we
declare SACK reneging and entering TCP_CA_Loss, and unmarks it after
the last rate sample was taken before moving back to TCP_CA_Open. This
patch also invalidates rate samples taken while tcp_sock.is_sack_reneg
is set.
Fixes: b9f64820fb22 ("tcp: track data delivery rate for a TCP connection")
Signed-off-by: Yousuk Seung <ysseung@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Priyaranjan Jha <priyarjha@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/tcp.h | 3 ++-
include/net/tcp.h | 2 +-
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 10 ++++++++--
net/ipv4/tcp_rate.c | 10 +++++++---
5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/tcp.h
+++ b/include/linux/tcp.h
@@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ struct tcp_sock {
} rack;
u16 advmss; /* Advertised MSS */
u8 rate_app_limited:1, /* rate_{delivered,interval_us} limited? */
- unused:7;
+ is_sack_reneg:1, /* in recovery from loss with SACK reneg? */
+ unused:6;
u8 nonagle : 4,/* Disable Nagle algorithm? */
thin_lto : 1,/* Use linear timeouts for thin streams */
thin_dupack : 1,/* Fast retransmit on first dupack */
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ void tcp_rate_skb_sent(struct sock *sk,
void tcp_rate_skb_delivered(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct rate_sample *rs);
void tcp_rate_gen(struct sock *sk, u32 delivered, u32 lost,
- struct skb_mstamp *now, struct rate_sample *rs);
+ bool is_sack_reneg, struct skb_mstamp *now, struct rate_sample *rs);
void tcp_rate_check_app_limited(struct sock *sk);
/* These functions determine how the current flow behaves in respect of SACK
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2297,6 +2297,7 @@ int tcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int
tp->snd_cwnd_cnt = 0;
tp->window_clamp = 0;
tcp_set_ca_state(sk, TCP_CA_Open);
+ tp->is_sack_reneg = 0;
tcp_clear_retrans(tp);
inet_csk_delack_init(sk);
/* Initialize rcv_mss to TCP_MIN_MSS to avoid division by 0
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1966,6 +1966,8 @@ void tcp_enter_loss(struct sock *sk)
NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPSACKRENEGING);
tp->sacked_out = 0;
tp->fackets_out = 0;
+ /* Mark SACK reneging until we recover from this loss event. */
+ tp->is_sack_reneg = 1;
}
tcp_clear_all_retrans_hints(tp);
@@ -2463,6 +2465,7 @@ static bool tcp_try_undo_recovery(struct
return true;
}
tcp_set_ca_state(sk, TCP_CA_Open);
+ tp->is_sack_reneg = 0;
return false;
}
@@ -2494,8 +2497,10 @@ static bool tcp_try_undo_loss(struct soc
NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk),
LINUX_MIB_TCPSPURIOUSRTOS);
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_retransmits = 0;
- if (frto_undo || tcp_is_sack(tp))
+ if (frto_undo || tcp_is_sack(tp)) {
tcp_set_ca_state(sk, TCP_CA_Open);
+ tp->is_sack_reneg = 0;
+ }
return true;
}
return false;
@@ -3589,6 +3594,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, cons
struct tcp_sacktag_state sack_state;
struct rate_sample rs = { .prior_delivered = 0 };
u32 prior_snd_una = tp->snd_una;
+ bool is_sack_reneg = tp->is_sack_reneg;
u32 ack_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
u32 ack = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ack_seq;
bool is_dupack = false;
@@ -3711,7 +3717,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, cons
tcp_schedule_loss_probe(sk);
delivered = tp->delivered - delivered; /* freshly ACKed or SACKed */
lost = tp->lost - lost; /* freshly marked lost */
- tcp_rate_gen(sk, delivered, lost, &now, &rs);
+ tcp_rate_gen(sk, delivered, lost, is_sack_reneg, &now, &rs);
tcp_cong_control(sk, ack, delivered, flag, &rs);
tcp_xmit_recovery(sk, rexmit);
return 1;
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_rate.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_rate.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void tcp_rate_skb_delivered(struct sock
/* Update the connection delivery information and generate a rate sample. */
void tcp_rate_gen(struct sock *sk, u32 delivered, u32 lost,
- struct skb_mstamp *now, struct rate_sample *rs)
+ bool is_sack_reneg, struct skb_mstamp *now, struct rate_sample *rs)
{
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
u32 snd_us, ack_us;
@@ -124,8 +124,12 @@ void tcp_rate_gen(struct sock *sk, u32 d
rs->acked_sacked = delivered; /* freshly ACKed or SACKed */
rs->losses = lost; /* freshly marked lost */
- /* Return an invalid sample if no timing information is available. */
- if (!rs->prior_mstamp.v64) {
+ /* Return an invalid sample if no timing information is available or
+ * in recovery from loss with SACK reneging. Rate samples taken during
+ * a SACK reneging event may overestimate bw by including packets that
+ * were SACKed before the reneg.
+ */
+ if (!rs->prior_mstamp.v64 || is_sack_reneg) {
rs->delivered = -1;
rs->interval_us = -1;
return;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists