[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180102105621.GB5645@mordor.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:26:21 +0530
From: Aishwarya Pant <aishpant@...il.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: Documentation: OMAPDSS: move sysfs documentation to ABI
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 12:16:18PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/01/18 10:54, Aishwarya Pant wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > In Documentation/arm/OMAP/DSS, there is a description of the DSS and FB sysfs
> > interfaces which could be moved to Documentation/ABI.
> >
> > Would such a change be useful? I can see that the sysfs interface is still in
> > testing.
> >
> > The ABI documentation format looks like the following:
> >
> > What: (the full sysfs path of the attribute)
> > Date: (date of creation)
> > KernelVersion: (kernel version it first showed up in)
> > Contact: (primary contact)
> > Description: (long description on usage)
> >
> > I am doing this in an exercise to move sysfs ABI interfaces (which are
> > documented) to their right place i.e. in Documentation/ABI along with the rest.
>
> The Documentation/arm/OMAP/DSS document is for omapfb driver, which is
> deprecated by the omapdrm driver. I haven't maintained omapfb for some
> time now, but I guess it still works ok. I hope we can drop omapfb at
> some point in the future.
>
> There probably are still omapfb users out there, so the ABI is valid,
> but I'd say it's quite at the bottom of the priority list.
All right, I will drop this then.
>
> Tomi
>
> --
> Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
> Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists