lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:38:29 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
        Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: drop duplicate exports of abort()

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:34:45AM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:31:12AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > We now have exports in both architecture code in in common code,
> > which causes a link failure when symbol versioning is eanbled, on
> > four architectures:
> > 
> > kernel/exit.o: In function `__crc_abort':
> > exit.c:(*ABS*+0xc0e2ec8b): multiple definition of `__crc_abort'
> > 
> > This removes the four architecture specific exports and only
> > leaves the export next to the __weak symbol.
> 
> Will it not be better to remove the abort() as they are exactly same
> like the weak function. That was the original plan we had when this
> weak function was done. Like in the attached patch..

If that was the plan, why wasn't it done - why did we end up with a
build-breaking patch merged in -mm?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ