[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1afd8769-8f51-184f-221d-4ce68f90371d@evidence.eu.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:31:51 +0100
From: Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates
Hi Peter,
Il 31/12/2017 10:43, Claudio Scordino ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> Il 20/12/2017 16:56, Peter Zijlstra ha scritto:
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 04:30:29PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>
>>> So I ended up with the below (on top of Juri's cpufreq-dl patches).
>>>
>>> It compiles, but that's about all the testing it had.
>>
>> Should all be available at:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git sched/core
>>
>> compile tested only, I suppose the 0day bot will let me know soon enough
>> :-)
>
> I'm going to do some testing from Tuesday.
The rebase looks good to me.
Tested on Odroid XU4 (ARM big.LITTLE), no regressions found.
Many thanks and best regards,
Claudio
Powered by blists - more mailing lists