[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXZkUZRnpuT=G85ZerULEyNF09DUJAVMfvx+eUn-WmL7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:57:00 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Niklas Soderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] gpio: rcar: Use WAKEUP_PATH driver PM flag
Hi Ulf,
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>>>> [Ulf: Converted to use the WAKEUP_PATH driver PM flag]
>>
>> Ulf: + killing the DEV_PM_OPS define, increasing kernel size if PM_SUSPEND=n?
>
> Oh, yes - correct!
>
> The code looks nicer, with the penalty of one static struct declared
> and not used, in case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is unset.
At 23 pointers of 4 or 8 bytes each in 3 drivers, I don't consider this
insignificant.
Fortunately this driver is not used on RZ/A1, which you can run without
external RAM if you manage to fit everything in 10 MiB of SRAM...
> Should I revert back to your proposal, I am fine with whatever?
Yes please.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists