linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <275fff97-e81d-2dd2-544f-f64137b63c70@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:26:33 -0500
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Cc:     xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

On 12/27/2017 10:46 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>

Applied to for-linus-4.15

-boris