linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/75] 4.9.74-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180102.133200.293358868256951664.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 02 Jan 2018 13:32:00 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     ncardwell@...gle.com
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, ycheng@...gle.com, soheil@...gle.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/75] 4.9.74-stable review

From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:57:59 -0500

> On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.74 release.
>> There are 75 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed Jan  3 14:00:03 UTC 2018.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.74-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> In looking at the 4.9 and 4.14 patches yesterday, I noticed there were
> two TCP BBR fixes that made it into 4.14 but not 4.9. Doing an
> inventory of the TCP BBR fixes, AFAICT we have:
> 
> c589e69b508d tcp_bbr: record "full bw reached" decision in new
> full_bw_reached bit
>  - in 4.9 and 4.14 (great)
> 
> 2f6c498e4f15 tcp_bbr: reset full pipe detection on loss recovery undo
>   - in 4.14 (but not 4.9)
> 
> 600647d467c6 tcp_bbr: reset long-term bandwidth sampling on loss recovery undo
>   - in 4.14 (but not 4.9)
> 
> Lacking the second and third patches in 4.9 will not cause any new
> problems, but it will miss out on some nice fixes. If it's possible to
> get  2f6c498e4f15 and 600647d467c6 either into 4.9.74 or 4.9.75, I
> would be very grateful.

These were not straight-forward to backport and I felt the risk outweighed
the gains.

If you want to do the backport yourself and you feel confident in it,
feel free.