lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:57:05 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Build bot for Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Kernel Build Reports Mailman List 
        <kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org>,
        linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
        "# 3.18.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: v3.18.86 build: 0 failures 1 warnings (v3.18.86)

On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:54:16AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:24:12AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Build bot for Mark Brown
> > <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > x86_64-defconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches
> > >
> > > Warnings:
> > >         ../include/linux/ftrace.h:632:36: warning: calling '__builtin_return_address' with a nonzero argument is unsafe [-Wframe-address]
> > >         ../include/linux/ftrace.h:632:36: warning: calling '__builtin_return_address' with a nonzero argument is unsafe [-Wframe-address]
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > This warning keeps coming up in 3.18 and 4.1 builds, which lack a backport of
> > 
> > ef6000b4c670 ("Disable the __builtin_return_address() warning globally
> > after all")
> > 
> > The other build bots use different gcc versions that don't report the
> > warning here,
> > so only Mark's bot triggers it. The warning in this file is harmless,
> > and the patch
> > only turns off the warning flag.
> 
> Ah, I tried to figure this one out in the past, thanks for this, I'll
> queue it up soon.  Hm, this isn't in 4.4.y, why is it not showing up
> there?  Due to a different backport of this type of thing?

Nope, doesn't apply to 3.18 at all, as the main part of this patch is
already in there.  I don't really understand it, it seems that the
cc-disable-warning option isn't working for me for 3.18 at all in my
local builds.  I spent a few hours on it last week, but gave up in the
end :(

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ