linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: suppress warning when __GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22c96e2d-e6c5-47c2-1d8e-c47c6498c330@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jan 2018 11:09:49 +0100
From:   Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
To:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:     imirkin@...m.mit.edu, efault@....de, michel@...nzer.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: suppress warning when __GFP_NOWARN is set v2

Am 02.01.2018 um 21:51 schrieb Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 01:13:58PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> [SNIP]
>> +
>> +phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
>> +				   dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr,
>> +				   phys_addr_t orig_addr, size_t size,
>> +				   enum dma_data_direction dir,
>> +				   unsigned long attrs)
> Hm, could be my editor, but are the parameters on the same line as 'struct device *hwdev'?

Looks like just an issue in your editor.

I've fixed all other suggestions and going to send out v3 of the patch 
in a minute.

Thanks,
Christian.